[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:16:46PM -0400, chris wrote: > Just FYI some Atom cpu's do actually have VT. I got my hands on a > netbook with Atom Z5 series cpu and was able to run a windows guest > under it. > > http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035 > > - chris > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Fabiano Francesconi > <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:55:24PM +0100, Andrew Lyon wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Fabiano Francesconi > >> <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hello there, > >> > I'm noticing a performance regression for what's matter the hard-disk I > >> > pass to the domU (aquaria). > >> > >> > >> Have you checked the performance of the disk in dom0? > >> > >> > > >> > The slow-down is very noticeable even when moving small videos file > >> > (~350mb). > >> > > >> > In the configuration file of the domU, I pass the whole disk > >> > ('phy:/dev/sdb,xvdb,w') to the guest OS. > >> > > >> > The distribution under both systems is Gentoo/Linux, x86 arch. > >> > > >> > The hypervisor is always the same, in both scenarios (Linux xevelon > >> > 2.6.32-xen-r1 #1 SMP Sat Apr 10 13:37:02 CEST 2010 i686 Intel(R) > >> > Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux). > >> > > >> > The machine is an Atom, so it's not capable of any VT technology but so > >> > far it's a great machine and XEN is working just fine on it. > >> > > >> > I attach you few logs I've gathered. > >> > > >> > Thank you > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461] > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Xen-users mailing list > >> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >> > > > > > It seems, actually, that something has changed since the performance > > seems to be restored back to the normality. > > > > Mh, I can't explain that.. maybe I had some process keep running CPU > > high while I was performing that hdparm. > > > > I'll keep this thread up-to-date if something changes again. > > > > Sorry for this bad report. > > > > -- > > Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users It's an Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz ( http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35641&processor=330&spec-codes=SLG9Y ) so it does not have any VT. -- Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461] _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |