[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen hard-disk performance regression?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Fabiano Francesconi <fabiano.francesconi@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:29:05 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:30:34 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=E66K6IoRx+FN8q0oVAB7gGJ9QSnY4ZtslElEy/kZ8/c0dSDYEoHYEt/R/8t3IrPatq +MUfV8GMxiqlAjlFBLW2JDlgv0j0oCDN16X9OPn1MczodIfl8HZr7DppAF7IcFz6nq+q Zny3DZr6/PyBwFI3F2BA4mLrP3s9e8ZNSnvd8=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Mail-followup-to: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I've tried with a (almost) vanilla kernel (only gentoo patchsets).

I have the same issue so, I guess, it's a kernel misconfiguration /
kernel regression but it must be something wrong upstream too.

Since I've been sharing with you my whole anamnesi, any of you has any
clue?
-- 
Fabiano Francesconi [GPG key: 0x81E53461]

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.