[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] pci device not owned by pciback.
Hi James, >> Error: pci: improper device assignment specified: pci: 0000:0e:04.0 must >> be co-assigned to the same guest with 0000:0e:04.0, but it is not owned >> by pciback. What Xen version are you using? Are you using a pvops based kernel? Or a 'classic' xen kernel based on 2.6.18+patches? Are you sure it mentions the exact same id twice? It is more likely to report two almost identical ids, with a small difference in the last digit... (e.g. 0000:0e:04.1 must be co-assigned with 0000:0e:04.0) >> How do I make this card owned by pciback on reboot. Do I need to use the >> hide parameter on the kernel line on boot? > > It says to add something like this to the module line: > pciback.hide=(01:00.0)(00:02.0) For older kernel versions, you should use the command as stated above. For newer versions, the module is renamed to xen-pciback, and you'd state: xen-pciback.hide=(01:00.0)(00:02.0) > This page talks about VT and my domU is a PV. Does this same pciback > apply? Hiding is the same for VTd and for PV. However, the 'co-assigned' error message is typical for VTd, it doesn't allow devices on the same PCI bus to be divided over more than one vm. If you are passing through a single device to a PV machine, and xen gives you the above mentioned 'co-assigned' error, it is probably due to a bug in xen (which appeared a while ago, but has since been fixed). Regards, Mark _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |