[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [mdlabriola@xxxxxxxxx: [Xen-devel] Re: Re: [Xen-users] DomU routed traffic disappearing in vif.]
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:18 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Ian had a patch that he backported from XCP that might fix this, not > sure thought. If possible can someone who is seeing this issue try this patch: --- xen/netback: correctly setup skb->ip_summed on receive In 2.6.18 CHECKSUM_PARTIAL and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY were both synonyms for CHECKSUM_HW. This is no longer the case and we need to select the correct one. data_validated csum_blank -> ip_summed 0 0 CHECKSUM_NONE 0 1 CHECKSUM_PARTIAL 1 0 CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY 1 1 CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> diff -r 3a1424756f50 drivers/xen/netback/netback.c --- a/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c Fri May 07 14:38:37 2010 +0100 +++ b/drivers/xen/netback/netback.c Fri May 07 14:40:31 2010 +0100 @@ -1384,14 +1384,10 @@ netif_idx_release(pending_idx); } - /* - * Old frontends do not assert data_validated but we - * can infer it from csum_blank so test both flags. - */ - if (txp->flags & (NETTXF_data_validated|NETTXF_csum_blank)) + if (txp->flags & NETTXF_csum_blank) skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL; - else - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE; + else if (txp->flags & NETTXF_data_validated) + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; netbk_fill_frags(skb); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |