[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 vs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 on debian


  • To: Israel Garcia <igalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:13:54 +0530
  • Cc: Xen Users <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:45:12 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ajUF3SrGUNunuslQzS6MkkVw1XNxC6xhJ7rDo64f9Za4AH4TvzwpaV1wl0GS0OWfxQ uzvXKAT0FObsYpbqiU+dAgJH2LUGzyMpg5yfzoescAeC17tYohRU0CFIRyT5BV6FXv48 Vumf/pg5bQ8hYgagMIminPYfsa/1HQ5hHtyzg=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

>From my experience I tell it will be better to use a newer version.A
day before yesterday my xen daemon failed to start.I am still tracing
it as what went wrong.Better use the xen-4 and compile the binary if
you want to use the latest version it will be better than what you
mentioned.

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Israel Garcia <igalvarez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I find the pros, cons of using any of this kernels? Is it
> recommendable to use 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64? Better performance? More
> stable than 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64?
>
> --
> Regards;
> Israel Garcia
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>



-- 
Tapas

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.