[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen

  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Matej Zary <zary@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:45:32 +0200
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:51:02 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcsH4mmyf/sxw+ZARP+MPvBE1G5ong==
  • Thread-topic: Re: [Xen-users] RHEL6 beta vs. Xen

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:20 +0300, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Frank Pikelner wrote:
> >    One option may be to consider Fedora as they appear to be working to add
> >    Xen back in the next release:
> > 
> >    [1]http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/61745
> > 
> >    There are also Oracle Linux and CentOS that may do something about
> >    including Xen.
> > 
> Oracle is actively developing Xen.. especially pvops dom0 kernel.
> And Oracle has their own Xen-based virtualization solution (Oracle VM).
> -- Pasi

If my math is right, Oracle now owns 3 Xen solutions - they had their
own xen based Oracle VM. Later they bought another Xen based solution -
Virtual Iron (bought whole company IIRC). And with Sun acquisition, they
also got the Sun xVM (Xen with Solaris Dom0 IIRC). So it would be kind
of strange, if they decided to lay off the Xen development and
products. :)



<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.