[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Xen branches


  • To: "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:56:53 +0100
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:02:59 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcsoCNyxLPLeqiIdTtO/Kj6KWe8O9gAAFYpRAAKNgE0=
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Xen branches



Uhm, no.

Xen 3.4.x is NOT supported on RHEL5/CentOS5 !!

RHEL5/CentOS5 includes Xen hypervisor 3.1.2 (+a lot of patches by Redhat and from newer Xen versions).
That's the version that is supported by Redhat in RHEL5.

I believe xen.org is planning to release at least Xen 3.4.4 until 3.4 branch is 'forgotten'.
See: http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-3.4-testing.hg

"6 weeks ago:   Update Xen version to 3.4.4-rc1-pre".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Ah, so at the minute, I'm currently getting my kernel security fixes from RedHat, but getting my Xen security fixes from Gitco.
 
This sound ok (Security wise)? The reason why I didn't stick with the 3.1.2 version is becuase FreeBSD (My pfsense DomU firewall) won't boot in this version.
 
Of course, I'll use Xen 4.x once I get a testbed running nice and stable.
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Or would it be better if I got my kernel from kernel.org? Or maybe the Red Hat version of Xen (3.1.x) is safer than 3.4.3 from Gitco?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.