[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen4 + Remus + iSCSI


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Åukasz OleÅ <lukaszoles@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:07:22 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:08:38 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=rZ/LvK8Zvb1iLe5zU+WBRFIxPWrEK3XZbjaoaX601+sdv/LlIU/C4fKiCwBZYAtgi7 JTLwavLgdura2z/SenU8bcuz89rXigK9OnKaulB50FyzvU0cFUGgQGqzoEIDEm0KXX9c f6pWXz1vmj0SLE9Ts62zNOwRWrWjkxRwdl5Fk=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Sunday 20 June 2010 14:56:12 Thomas von Stetten wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 
> 
> we are using debian, xen 3.x and a iscsi-storage with ext4 as filesystem.
> Heartbeat is used for xen-ha.
> 
> Now we like to change to xen 4 and remus.
> 
> The iscsi SAN is available on active-Dom0 and backup-Dom0.
> 
> I donÂt have to use the disk buffering, as I understand remus right,
> because the file system on both machines is the same.
> 
> With ext4 we donÂt had problems at the xen3-Cluster on live migration. Also
> on tested hardware crashes.
> 
> 
> 
> Is it right to disable the disk replication and the remus will work fine
> for ha?
> 

No, it wont work. See 
http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/Remus http://nss.cs.ubc.ca/remus/doc.html and 
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-07/msg00402.html

--
Åukasz OleÅ

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.