[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?

To: ma qiang <maqiang1984@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:29:50 +0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:31:16 -0700
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, ma qiang <maqiang1984@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,
I have run iozone in domU, and the results performs better than
in dom0? In my options, dom0 should perform like physical host, and
better than domU.
Why?

Are you using file-backed domUs? If yes, then possibly it's dom0 caching effect.

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?
  - From: ma qiang

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?
Next by Date: [Xen-users] AW: Xen-users Digest, Vol 66, Issue 27
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?
Next by thread: [Xen-users] AW: Xen-users Digest, Vol 66, Issue 27
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.