[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] remus vs. pacemaker/drbd?

To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:40:37 -0400
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:41:55 -0700
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Folks,

Anybody have any experience and/or opinions re. Remus vs. Pacemaker/DRBDas a high-availability solution for a very small cluster (2 machines)?


Thanks,

Miles Fidelman

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In<fnord>  practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Step-by-step tutorial: Installing Xen 4.0.1 rpms on Fedora 13 with pvops Linux 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu Lucid 10.04 - Desktop / Server - 64 Bits - With OpenGL (Intel GEM) enabled - From Linuxcon Brazil! :-D
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] remus vs. pacemaker/drbd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.