[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Trying to compile linux kernel from http://xenbits.xen.org/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg .


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Priyadarsan Roy <priyadarsanroy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:21:33 +0530
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:54:11 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=JfW47PT/LclgHk3n6KZkxCohdkHxqKri6eTp4o+ImDlRFq9bIX/pjtlUAnQE9jjXsD tlCLY4ogMz/+uRP/Cs688WPcoxnTtbt67YbSFA2YJJXL5lsJ8hjYWUgstKh+xGS2jZII X8YtjO1yjly8ieqPBhdvL+BpGkpwFn+JDPctE=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


One strange thing I notice is when I do file on the kernels I get as below

snomdom0:/boot# file vmlinuz-2.6.*
vmlinuz-2.6.18.8:       gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Mon Nov  1 23:28:02 2010, max compression
vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-amd64: Linux kernel x86 boot executable RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x900, swap_dev 0x1, Normal VGA

And no I have installed a 64 bit Linux and also compiled from the same system.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Priyadarsan Roy <priyadarsanroy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No I installed a 64 bit version of Debian. And so did I compile from the same system.

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Priyadarsan Roy
<priyadarsanroy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Error:13 Invalid or unsupported executable format.

Are you trying to boot a 64 bit kernel on a 32 bit system?

Thanks,
Todd

--
Todd Deshane
http://todddeshane.net
http://runningxen.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.