[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Can affect the virtualization the samba performance?

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Periko Support <pheriko.support@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:45:03 -0800
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:46:38 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cxvhLSMW5c6XiYKWjIUqUJFqou6cTsgyNZ9Uw+Zc6YdSbpsxAvnlqdDO5DHSZApy+b /0jG/y2cHdpnJaXiiIoH8yJHpEUVFGpWPYnYBmOYeTZY+JaoALf5wP5CSYzF6H7xbUP7 KUrhXMrgvTzzd2zBUw2EqoT1XuJOJnHi5CiI4=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, kazabe <kazabe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi.
> i was migrate samba from an old woody server to a virtualized lenny on
> a new server.  The virtualized server has four times more resources
> than the old server, but some times the performance is really poor.
> im discarding all the samba tunning options, but i dont know how to
> discard any virtualization issue.  The disk is a img file on the
> server, formatted on ext3.
> Im evaluating request a dedicated disk to the samba virtual server,
> but before i need confirm if the problem is really by disk
> performance.
> How can i evaluate if the virtualization can have any relation with
> the samba performance?
> thanks and regards.
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Do u have raid on the dom-0? Raid-0,1,5,10?
Have u tune your server?
Have u benchmark your FS? Bonnie, Bonnie++,fio,tiobench,dd,hdparm,iozone,dbench?
This will take a lot of time but will let u know with settings will
give u the best performance for a service la samba.
Good luck!!!

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.