[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs

  • To: Matej Zary <matej.zary@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:55:41 +0200
  • Cc: "jg@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dustin Black <vantage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:57:30 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=hLkrhrGdLlhhFZghBmRh7iqlbkWLorx/huG0LsexcglHqA4mJfboIU8v8qIWH2sdcesy+vqnf+66BuXqFuOkV5jVlDL0mNfygDfPqgTPuHdOCv4AeF4Eqyms5Yvfghc6;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matej Zary <matej.zary@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Depends on quality of NAS/SAN device. Some of them are more reliable&robust 
> that rest of the infrastructure (dual controllers, raid6, multipathing etc.), 
> obviously they cost arm&leg. So they SHOULD not totally fail (firmware issues 
> are  another thing though). And in that case, even if one owns enterprise 
> grade storage, backups (tape, another storage, remote site) are always must. 
> Yeah, if storage fails, there will be downtime. You can still have locals 
> disks on xen host. So for example you can restore most important Xen guests 
> on the local disks from backups and live without live migration until the 
> NAS/SAN issues are solved.
> Matej
> ________________________________________

Well, that's the problem. We have (had, soon to be returned) a so
called "enterprise SAN" with dual everything, but it failed miserably
during December and we ended up migrating everyone to a few older NAS
devices just to get the client's websites up again (VPS hosting). So,
just cause a SAN has dual PSU's, dual controllers, dual NIC's, dual
HEAD's, etc doesn't mean it's non-redundant.

I'm thinking of setting up 2 independent SAN's, of for that matter
even NAS clusters, and then doing something like RAID1 (mirror) on the
client nodes with the iSCSI mounts. But, I don't know if it's feasible
or worth the effort. Has anyone done something like this ?

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.