[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] XCP and Openfiler as the storage


  • To: cluster@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:12:31 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Bragatto <eduardo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:14:12 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-ID:X-Assp-Version:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=hzeM4fKXlnJmUAyqxBLGaAcMiIn7AbL0tFR0Xg1aC53DHGeEnT10VwALPMMJjoubtJnT3FzooSYf9AeZ2F4yd4qGG6CAhOasefmpuiNXJWWWnPKfIHljFAdKr4DbJGux;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:24 PM,  <cluster@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> I am using this scenario (openfiler + XCP) from more than 1 year. I have had
> no performance loss but my openfiler is patched for using fibrechannel.
>
> I suggest you to create only a big LUN (less than 2TB remember) and let XCP
> manage it.
>
> Best regards,
> FG


I'm just curious,  what do you do of the OpenFiler fails completely?
It will fail, sooner or later.
What method of standby-NAS / failover do you have in place?

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.