[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] scsi host passthru not working after upgrade to 4.1.0

  • To: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:35:07 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:36:28 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hgUYhIjITQY/+cuJw4eMNuNa+c0qnoI6bUwk1wyY5YjDPNU4z62LKjBFt9OBLhwYOx nE6WvguwVo/QKyXVTADzA+vIBmvu5AEbx2ltMeVAdsldqOJEeK96bsrTctMK7I8sVJgp cTpXfghpXYcHP+C1h7fvMcHvTkYd3y8pfKlhw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>> > Kernel is 2.6.38 xenified using suse patches, not pv_ops.
> Could you share this xenifier-patch with us?
> http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel only has sources up to 2.6.34
> and a suse-xenified kernel is still a must when we want to use nvidia-binary-
> drivers....
> Thanks in advance!
> Greetings
> Tobias

Hi Tobias,

I've uploaded 2.6.38-r1 patches and ebuild to
http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list , ebuild
uses genpatches v4 for kernel, I've not actually tested this
set myself as I am currently running 2.6.38 and several long running
jobs make it inconvenient to reboot, however I do not expect any
problems as the current 2.6.38 suse patches that I use do not require
any changes at all to apply to vanilla.

I've not had time to update for a while so I've gone straight from .34
to .38, but so far it seems very stable.


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.