[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Bad TCP accept performance

  • To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
  • From: Carl Byström <cgbystrom@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 16:45:20 +0200
  • Cc: Russ Purinton <rpurinton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 May 2011 07:47:11 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rzjCsaecVrKayAJj/zObrKxT3hDTPwN1ZWDw2yoCX++0t/q049InZgKzF+hsftdTQJ icACzMz1O+4udfYabb4QelhOQVcHUcXYCTfUJo60dzQ7GwKmuDCWeWkci6jHX2Wz+YEX kizp3OUWeCW30NSCslyDEJFwZ0FXNDNQwBc5g=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>    How well performs however is kind of a moot point however as no
>    real application would make use of this.

That's true.

I've tested and got about the same connection rate between two separate, physical machines.
That's what led me into testing using only loopback. My presumption was that if the loopback cannot produce the numbers I want, neither would the physical interface.

But I guess it's easy to be fooled by what Xen are doing at a low level when virtualized. So don't get me wrong, I'm all ears.
Carl Byström
Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.