[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Alternatives to a dual-primary DRBD setup

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 10:35:29 -0400
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:40:34 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZuNY8kN3QgV6morDgEE3Yi7dTZ/NVk91uS52Gw5gXgsu8W7DGGPOvRAy2zVfmNbbRM cQDvspx7r/11fTljXHkGHF8VOY8EvPBG2vLaa7GuiNFl0svQ/GYNukJWCDJ+lXL5E3Ax y/3smup7iw6cC1Xhyx/hnG9XgSqeM3k5pVmm4=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

A good rule of thumb is to use jumbo frames, that will get you less cpu usage, although if you saw you don't have resource issues nowadays, DRBD shouldn't break using regular MTU.

Regards,
Ciro

El may 21, 2011 8:10 a.m., "Daniel Meszaros" <meszi@xxxxxxxxxxx> escribiÃ:

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users] OpenSUSE 11.4 (2.6.39-30.1), Xen 4.0.2 - Device 0 (vif) Could not be connected
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] OpenSUSE 11.4 (2.6.39-30.1), Xen 4.0.2 - Device 0 (vif) Could not be connected
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Solving the DRBD resync issue (was: Alternatives to a dual-primary DRBD setup)
Next by thread: [Xen-users] RHEL6 xen and dom0 kernel to test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.