Re: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Updating Xen 4.1.x xmexamples files (vfb line required for HVM guests)

[Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>]

What kernel are you running ?

Boris.

--- On Tue, 8/2/11, jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: jim burns <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Updating Xen 4.1.x xmexamples files (vfb line required for HVM guests)
To: "M A Young" <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 5:57 PM

M A Young said:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

>> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 06:07:39AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>>> I've installed  xen-4.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm.  It doesn't contain mentioned
patch.
>>> Added patch as raw content of
>>>
>>>    http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg/rev/1976adbf2b80

> It already is in xen-4.1.1-2.fc16 and xen-4.1.1-2.fc15 .

>         Michael Young

[516] > rpm -q --last xen
xen-4.1.1-2.fc16                              Fri 22 Jul 2011 10:24:57 PM EDT

Huh!!! I guess I never tried removing the vfb= line since I got this update. I
can verify that the vfb= line is no longer necessary. Sorry for making so much
noise about this problem. (Also odd that the vfb= line was a temporary fix!)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel