[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] [XCP] XCP 1.5 Beta Create Local SR
From: "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@seakr">Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:05:38 -0700 On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 18:24 -0600, hga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: "Nick Couchman" <Nick.Couchman@seakr">Couchman@seakr">Couchman@seakr">Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:47:10 -0700 > > I installed XCP 1.5 Beta, and it partitioned by HD > correctly but did not actually create a local SR. The > creation of a local SR through the "xe" command is > sufficiently complicated enough that I'm not confident > about doing it - could someone post the list of steps (or > a link to a document that outlines how) to create an SR > using a local disk volume? > Here's what I puzzled out for XCP 1.1 by looking at the > default sr's params; I found the device id (for the > whole disk) and used it in the sr-create command: > cat /proc/partitions -> > > major minor #blocks name > > 8 0 1953514584 sda > [...] > > ls -l /dev/disk/by-id -> > > total 0 > [...] > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Aug 11 16:21 scsi-35000c50033e2ff7f -> ../../sda > [...] > > xe sr-create name-label="Local storage slow 01" type=lvm content-type=user shared=false device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-35000c50033e2ff7f > The only significant difference in the sr params > compared to the original automatically created on > installation "Local storage" sr was this, which was in > the default but not in the one I created: > other-config (MRW): i18n-original-value-name_label: Local storage; i18n-key: local-storage Thanks, Harold, You're welcome. Interestingly in the XCP 1.5 beta release I do not see /dev/disk/by-id, so I wasn't able to use that. Instead, I came up with the following command: xe sr-create content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda3 host-uuid=47f5967d-76c9-4e66-b6e6-543afcf1c19e name-label="Local storage" shared=false type=lvm I have a concern that that's fragile; add or subtract a USB stick or another disk or whatever and what is /dev/sda *might* change. The device is used to create a pbd; here's the relevant output from my machine: xe pbd-list">pbd-list -> uuid ( RO) : a844364c-fc70-f4ce-4ca1-785224cf7dc4 host-uuid ( RO): 75de5d76-0011-4296-85b1-100567147c46 sr-uuid ( RO): e77ffc8a-ed78-c9b0-7ed4-702308cce130 device-config (MRO): device: /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-3600508e0000000006069ef5986d41402-part3 currently-attached ( RO): true [...] uuid ( RO) : da707dd6-d1cf-a460-cc76-6ca55f413813 host-uuid ( RO): 75de5d76-0011-4296-85b1-100567147c46 sr-uuid ( RO): 2415abc5-7d90-10e5-49db-39cc21c4eba0 device-config (MRO): device: /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-35000c50033e2ff7f currently-attached ( RO): true In the first one, the 3rd partition is used and I gather XCP 1.5 has the same layout with Dom0 in partition 1, partition 2 is of identical length (used for a backup command?) and the third, comprising the rest of the disk, was left for the Local storage sr. Perhaps someone who's installed 1.5 could provide us with a listing from the relevant pdb so that we can see how it's done in this version? In the second I just gave it the whole disk. In reflection, I'm not sure that was a good idea (vs. a partition using the whole disk), it violates the normal usage; can't remember why I did it. This should have been done at install time by the installer, so not sure if this is a bug or just a glitch during the install I was doing? I would think the former; that's how 1.1 works (and as I recall it didn't give you an option *not* to create a local repository, although strictly speaking in a proper XCP cloud your VMs' storage is going to be separate so that you can easily migrate them and so forth). You might want to try a raw installation again to see if if you've found a bug or if 1.5 just allows an option not to create a local sr. - Harold _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |