[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualization: XCP-1.5 on VirtualBox 4.1.16

  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Eric <epretorious@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 04:16:30 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UhK3RCEf4kakiTwRoavsrnmONYUF+zdoA3WPy5wYvhqPUTwRrnNe2nDwLlLsKcoh9Fb76HL6bdQP5EGMno8m4Krj942MVkNpzKzmHpVrDEOh+HvZMTyAk5Iv1gpwYiE3rtGFlbayT+jtEO+1zXRjCURgfNmPXTV5oYHSsklwrQY=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

From: Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Eric <epretorious@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualization: XCP-1.5 on VirtualBox 4.1.16

Just stop right there.

If you ONLY have 32bit cpu, and you ONLY have 1GB to give to
virtualbox to test, then don't bother using XCP. You simply don't have
enough resource to test. If you had (for example) a PC/notebook with
64 cpu and 4G of RAM, you'll have more room to test.

As it is, if you wanted to do tests you'd better stick with either
RHEL5 or ubuntu 12.04, with their respective version of xen, on bare

Thank you, Fajar:

That all seems reasonable to me. I'll stick to nesting Xen Hypervisor (ver 3.0.3 on CentOS 5.7-i386) inside VirtualBox (4.1.16) on my laptop.

Eric Pretorious
Truckee, CA
Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.