[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Poor Windows 2003 + GPLPV performance compared to VMWare
Additional information accidentally omitted: The dom0 machine is a debian testing running Xen 4.1 xm info host : pm08 release : 3.2.0-3-amd64 version : #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 6 nr_nodes : 1 cores_per_socket : 6 threads_per_core : 1 cpu_mhz : 3300 hw_caps : 178bf3ff:efd3fbff:00000000:00001310:00802001:00000000:000837ff:00000000 virt_caps : hvm total_memory : 16351 free_memory : 2 free_cpus : 0 xen_major : 4 xen_minor : 1 xen_extra : .3 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler : credit xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset : unavailable xen_commandline : placeholder cc_compiler : gcc version 4.7.1 (Debian 4.7.1-7) cc_compile_by : waldi cc_compile_domain : debian.org cc_compile_date : Fri Aug 17 09:41:02 UTC 2012 xend_config_format : 4 If I should provide any other information, please let me know. Regards, Adam On 13/09/12 22:25, Adam Goryachev wrote: > I have an application server running on MS Windows 2003, which was a > clean install on VMWare last year (after a failed migration attempt to > XenServer). > > At this point, a benchmark (actually a live process run regularly on the > machine) produced a result of 7800 to 7900 transactions per second > > I've recently migrated this to Xen by: > 1) Uninstall VMWare tools > 2) Shutdown Windows > 3) Use VMWare to download the vmdk > 4) Write the VMDK file (dd) to the same LVM that contained the VMWare > storage area (which was exported by iSCSI to VMWare > 5) Installed Debian Testing with Xen 4.1 > 6) Using the exactl same iSCSI server/LVM config etc, started the VM > 7) Installed the GPLPV drivers > > Everything seemed to work, and all was good. > > Then, the user ran the above process, and got consistently, results of > approx 2500 transactions per second > > I increased the vcpus from 2 to 4, but this didn't change the result at all. > > I modifed the domU config for the disk line from hda to xvda, and the > result increased slightly to 2560 / sec (these tests are just one off > tests, no verification of actual performance increase etc...). > > In any case, I seem to have a significant loss of performance on the > domU when compared to VMWare. > > The storage server/network is identical > The dom0 machine is identical to the VMWare machine > > Here is my current domU config file: > > kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-4.1/boot/hvmloader" > builder = 'hvm' > memory = 4096 > shadow_memory = 12 > device_model = '/usr/lib/xen-default/bin/qemu-dm' > localtime = 1 > name = "vm1" > cpus = "2,3,4,5" # Which physical CPU's to allow > vcpus = 4 # How many Virtual CPU's to present > viridian = 1 > disk = [ > 'phy:/dev/disk/by-path/ip-10.30.10.23:3260-iscsi-iqn.2012-06.domain:vm1-lun-0,xvda,w' > ] > vif = ['bridge=xenbr0, mac=00:16:3e:39:10:1a'] > boot = 'c' > sdl = 0 > vnc = 1 > vncdisplay = 10 > vncviewer = 0 > vncconsole = 0 > vncunused = 0 > stdvga = 1 > usb = 1 > usbdevice = 'tablet' > acpi = 1 > apic = 1 > on_reboot = 'restart' > on_poweroff = 'destroy' > on_crash = 'restart' > audio = 0 > > Any suggestions on how to improve performance would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you, > Adam > -- Adam Goryachev Website Managers www.websitemanagers.com.au _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |