[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] kvm v xen
On Jun 5, 2013 6:24 PM, "Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:58:26PM -0600, jacek burghardt wrote:
> > Is kvm in anyway better than xen. I heard that kvm has better support for
>
> Xen and KVM have different architecture. You need to define "better"
> here. :-)
>
> > assigning videocards and you don't need expensive video cards with kvm. So
>
> Sorry, I don't follow. "Expensive video cards" is never a requirement
> for using Xen.
>
> > is there a way to port kvm improvements to xen ?
>
> If you find out what KVM does better in terms of video card support, you
> can then add your feature requests to user voice or email the lists,
> then we developers can have a look at what we can do.
>
> What's even better is you come up with patches to improve Xen. You're
> always welcomed.
>
>
> Wei.
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
These threads appear all the time and are not productive. They are different architectures that's it. Figure out what you want to do, and use the one that is best for you.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
