[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: RKDTOO <arkady.me@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:51:42 +0000
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

As of ESXI VMware stoped using RedHat for the management console VM. They say
now that the management is inbeded into the hypervisor and it's based on
BusyBox.



--
View this message in context: 
http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/Is-Xen-really-a-Type-1-Hypervisor-tp5643400p5720205.html
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
  - From: Wei Liu

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] Xen Security Advisory 82 (CVE-2013-6885) - Guest triggerable AMD CPU erratum may cause host hang
Next by Date: [Xen-users] domU fails to reboot if disks use drbd resources
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] Xen Security Advisory 82 (CVE-2013-6885) - Guest triggerable AMD CPU erratum may cause host hang
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Is Xen really a Type 1 Hypervisor?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.