[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Cheap IOMMU hardware and ECC support importance
David Sutton <kantras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > To confirm; if by 'Phenom 965' you are referring to the "Phenom II X4 > 965" That's the one. > (which I have in the xen-enabled desktop machine in front of me) then > power-wise its similar to the AMD FX 8350 (which I have in the XenServer > instance behind me) - both are 125W TDP (unless you have the 140W TDP > variant of the 965) If the motherboard supported it, you could even look at > a 8320. Interesting, IIRC the 8350 was criticised a lot for it's power consumption. Now there's indication that it even uses less than the 965. 8320? That's AM3+ already. > But since your motherboard only supports an AM3 chipset, that does really > limit your options. Perhaps I could switch to another board; they shouldn't cost a fortune off ebay. But what would provide a /significant/ increase in performance without costing money big time? For what I'm doing, what I have is fast enough, and it works reliably. Overall fps rates with a single application could be better, yet if I have to, I can change graphics settings and keep them decent. It's not a big deal, and higher fps rates make the graphics card draw more power to the point at which my UPS starts beeping because it can't handle that much. So I can't see spending a lot of money to resolve a very minor issue. Considering I'd get UEFI and uncontrolled remote management doesn't make it appealing at all to buy something new, even if I had the money. -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |