[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] HTPC + DUAL PC In one


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Kuba <kuba.0000@xxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 17:28:40 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:29:15 +0000
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xen.org>

W dniu 2014-07-17 17:07, Gordan Bobic pisze:
On 07/17/2014 03:37 PM, Kuba wrote:
W dniu 2014-07-16 10:19, Gordan Bobic pisze:
I haven't tried any encryption, but I do use them heavily with ZFS,
mostly 4-disk RAIDZ2. Receive always saturates the gigabit ethernet
link and scrubs go at about 250MB/s. All my models are older N36L
(1.3GHz) and N40L (1.5GHz), i.e. substantially less CPU than the most
recent N54L (2.2GHz).

If it wouldn't be to much to ask, could you please run:

cryptsetup benchmark

or (if the above is not available):

openssl speed aes-128-cbc aes-256-cbc

on one of your servers? If it's not too much trouble, it would give me
all the info I need to decide on buying one and I would be very grateful
for that:)

On an old N36L (1.3GHz) model:

$ openssl speed aes-128-cbc aes-256-cbc
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 7040280 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1902846 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 486582 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 309199 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 39229 aes-128 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256 cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: 5111478 aes-256 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256 cbc for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1334811 aes-256 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256 cbc for 3s on 256 size blocks: 339037 aes-256 cbc's in 2.99s
Doing aes-256 cbc for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 218483 aes-256 cbc's in 3.00s
Doing aes-256 cbc for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 27568 aes-256 cbc's in 3.00s
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
built on: Mon Apr  7 23:06:03 CDT 2014
options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(8x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial)
idea(int) blowfish(idx)
compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT
-DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2
-g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY
-DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM
-DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192
bytes
aes-128 cbc      37548.16k    40594.05k    41521.66k   105539.93k
107121.32k
aes-256 cbc      27261.22k    28475.97k    29027.92k    74575.53k 75279.02k


I expect it would be about 70% higher on the N54L (2.2GHz) model you
would get if you buy a new one now.

Thanks, much appreciated!

Kuba

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.