[Xen-users] Xen Security Advisory 120 (CVE-2015-2150) - Non-maskable interrupts triggerable by guests

[Xen.org security team <security@xxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

            Xen Security Advisory CVE-2015-2150 / XSA-120
                              version 4

              Non-maskable interrupts triggerable by guests

UPDATES IN VERSION 4
====================

Public release.

ISSUE DESCRIPTION
=================

Guests are currently permitted to modify all of the (writable) bits in
the PCI command register of devices passed through to them. This in
particular allows them to disable memory and I/O decoding on the
device unless the device is an SR-IOV virtual function, in which case
subsequent accesses to the respective MMIO or I/O port ranges would
- - on PCI Express devices - lead to Unsupported Request responses. The
treatmeant of such errors is platform specific.

IMPACT
======

In the event that the platform surfaces aforementioned UR responses as
Non-Maskable Interrupts, and either the OS is configured to treat NMIs
as fatal or (e.g. via ACPI's APEI) the platform tells the OS to treat
these errors as fatal, the host would crash, leading to a Denial of
Service.

VULNERABLE SYSTEMS
==================

Xen versions 3.3 and onwards are vulnerable due to supporting PCI
pass-through. Upstream Linux versions 3.1 and onwards are vulnerable
due to supporting PCI backend functionality. Other Linux versions as
well as other OS versions may be vulnerable too.

Any domain which is given access to a non-SR-IOV virtual function PCI
Express device can take advantage of this vulnerability.

MITIGATION
==========

This issue can be avoided by not assigning PCI Express devices other
than SR-IOV virtual functions to untrusted guests.

CREDITS
=======

This issue was discovered by Jan Beulich of SUSE.

RESOLUTION
==========

Applying the appropriate attached patch resolves this issue for the
indicated versions of Linux, but only for ordinary PCI config space
accesses by the guest. See XSA-124 for all other cases.

xsa120.patch                Linux 3.19
xsa120-classic.patch        linux-2.6.18-xen.hg

$ sha256sum xsa120*.patch
ecd4568d418d6e275f1eebdba4867e7cfdc6a487292db0e9eff0e9e7e2c91826  
xsa120-classic.patch
32441fd3930848f7533f74376648fbeb5e35870661e1259860fe10f9a1f67f88  xsa120.patch
$

DEPLOYMENT DURING EMBARGO
=========================

Deployment of the patches and/or mitigations described above (or
others which are substantially similar) is permitted during the
embargo, even on public-facing systems with untrusted guest users and
administrators.

But: Distribution of updated software is prohibited (except to other
members of the predisclosure list).

Predisclosure list members who wish to deploy significantly different
patches and/or mitigations, please contact the Xen Project Security
Team.

(Note: this during-embargo deployment notice is retained in
post-embargo publicly released Xen Project advisories, even though it
is then no longer applicable.  This is to enable the community to have
oversight of the Xen Project Security Team's decisionmaking.)

For more information about permissible uses of embargoed information,
consult the Xen Project community's agreed Security Policy:
  http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU/tzUAAoJEIP+FMlX6CvZcDcIALHGaamMEPKtOANKkWW7cxJz
zWrgU+6cg/slx6wlgTnHB0/9N/zb9VPUZO3j7TS4VNL6z5zu3S1aTelo5w0F5j2N
rbQrmnJ56P7iTGU0UwerueGPUzRAOqw5JNJK/i7Y2nZo/r7Y8IkwZub8nxpeBaPF
YN3gqd7iTmq5IkM0mQNUuSmneLlMVX32dITSatKjaUNaBI54aH8byM+lUjdFyUYv
tKjb6HJD0upo7e5MPmchC1+/1B+Jm7YfAIMJ6Mn168pHMSy9Zn0p0zFeVGCA41u7
L28yDiIVfu1XWcOLWryAQQ4e/rMv1Bpy7Q259SUUj4bUiQDmRdqOdZmaXHlO/Po=
=H+jB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: xsa120-classic.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: xsa120.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users