[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] [QEMU #1578192] Re: xen_kbdfront: unhandled keycode 0x0
[BCC'ing xen-users, and cc'ing Anthony] On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:25 PM, <sm8ax1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just in case anyone was following this thread, I traced the bug back to > Qemu, so it is in fact not a Xen bug. Here's my qemu-devel post: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-05/msg00119.html > > and here's my formal bug report and patch > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1578192 > > I haven't received so much as an acknowledgement from qemu-devel or the bug > tracker, so I expect this issue to remain open for quite a while. If you run > into this bug, apply gtk.c.patch for a good-enough fix, and notify the Qemu > developers that you reproduced it. Since it's not a Xen bug, I'm only > following up here for completeness. Anthony / Stefano, Do you know who the right person in the qemu community might be to chase with this question? Thanks, -George > > ----- Forwarded message from sm8ax1@xxxxxxxxxxx ----- > Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 11:27:22 -0500 > From: sm8ax1@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: GTK+ interface doesn't translate keycodes properly with Wayland > backend (Fwd: [Xen-users] xen_kbdfront: unhandled keycode 0x0) > To: qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Here's my original thread forwarded from the xen-users mailing list, but I > think I've traced the problem to Qemu. I'm no expert, but it looks like GTK+ > key events come in at the ui/gtk.c:gd_key_event callback function, which > calls ui/gtk.c:gd_map_keycode to translate the GTK+ keycode into the Qemu > keycode before sending it on using qemu_input_event_send_key_number. The > problem is that gd_map_keycode is incomplete when GTK+ is running on a > backend other than X11. > > static int gd_map_keycode(GtkDisplayState *s, GdkDisplay *dpy, int > gdk_keycode) > { > int qemu_keycode; > > #ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_WIN32 > if (GDK_IS_WIN32_DISPLAY(dpy)) { > qemu_keycode = MapVirtualKey(gdk_keycode, MAPVK_VK_TO_VSC); > switch (qemu_keycode) { > case 103: /* alt gr */ > qemu_keycode = 56 | SCANCODE_GREY; > break; > } > return qemu_keycode; > } > #endif > > if (gdk_keycode < 9) { > qemu_keycode = 0; > } else if (gdk_keycode < 97) { > qemu_keycode = gdk_keycode - 8; > #ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11 > } else if (GDK_IS_X11_DISPLAY(dpy) && gdk_keycode < 158) { > if (s->has_evdev) { > qemu_keycode = translate_evdev_keycode(gdk_keycode - 97); > } else { > qemu_keycode = translate_xfree86_keycode(gdk_keycode - 97); > } > #endif > } else if (gdk_keycode == 208) { /* Hiragana_Katakana */ > qemu_keycode = 0x70; > } else if (gdk_keycode == 211) { /* backslash */ > qemu_keycode = 0x73; > } else { > qemu_keycode = 0; > } > > return qemu_keycode; > } > > In my case, I'm using GTK+'s Wayland backend, so keycodes 97 through 157 > (this includes KEY_HOME(102), KEY_PAGEUP(104), KEY_PAGEDOWN(109), > KEY_END(107), etc.) are never translated into a qemu_keycode, and the final > 'else' block is hit, causing gd_map_keycode to return 0, which is an invalid > keycode and thus cannot be handled by xen-kbdfront. At least that's my best > guess as to what is happening. > > The solution that comes to mind is provide an alternative to > translate_{evdev,xfree86}_keycode that is compatable with Wayland/libinput, > but I don't know exactly which API would provide this functionality, much > less do I have a patch. Intuition tells me that translate_evdev_keycode > would probably work under Wayland because Weston uses libinput which uses > evdev as its backend, but I don't know this for a fact, and I don't know if > it would be the Right Way (i.e. Wayland or libinput might provide an API for > this purpose, but I don't know). > > I may try to do some testing with translate_evdev_keycode on Wayland and > also look into any possible APIs for keycode translation, but I just wanted > to put it out there and get some feedback awhile. > > Qemu 2.2.1 from Xen 4.6.1 (relevant code appears unchanged in Qemu master) > GTK+ 3.18.7 > Wayland 1.9.0 > Weston 1.9.0 > libinput 1.2.3 > > PS: I'm not subscribed to qemu-devel so please reply to sender also. Thank > you! > > Quoting sm8ax1@xxxxxxxxxxx: > > For what it's worth, I found the offending code at > drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c:87. It looks like test_bit() is being > called with a 'keycode' of 0 as the bit number to be queried against > 'keybit', and returns 0 presumably because 0x0 is not a valid keycode (and > why would multiple keys have the same keycode in the first place?). > According to struct xenkbd_key, the keycode is a KEY_* from > include/linux/input.h, so this sounds like it's being used as the bit number > that we're testing for. The bit mask being tested is "struct > input_dev.keybit", which is documented as "@keybit: bitmap of keys/buttons > this device has". test_bit() is called twice, on info->kbd.keybit and > info->ptr.keybit, both struct input_dev, and so far I don't understand the > difference. But it fails both tests (read: neither kbd nor ptr "has" the key > that was supposedly pressed), and we are left with no device and thus no > handler. > > But if 0x0 is an invalid keycode, then it sounds like the problem is > somewhere further up the chain. I assume that scancodes are translated into > keycodes by qemu (since qemu takes a keymap) and thus is not xen-kbdfront's > bug. But I'll need some guidance on looking into qemu to find out where it > interacts with xen-kbdfront and attempting to find a problem with the > translation of scancodes to keycodes (why qemu is passing an invalid > keycode). > > As far as I can tell, I seem to be the first person to run into this > problem, so it could be user error, but any assistance in further debugging > this problem is appreciated. > > > Quoting sm8ax1@xxxxxxxxxxx: > > Hi, > I'm using Xen 4.6.1 with the xenfbfront and xenkbdfront PV drivers and the > bundled qemu-xen with the GTK+ interface, and certain keypresses cause the > following message to appear on the kernel console: > > xen_kbdfront: unhandled keycode 0x0 > > and the key does not do what it is supposed to. So far it appears that all > of the printable keys, control, alt, and shift, and even sequences like ^C > work, but Home, End, PgUp, PgDn, Pause/Break, etc cause the error above to > be printed. > > I tried adding > > vfb = ["vnc=1,keymap=en-us"] > > and I see the "-k en-us" argument being added to qemu, but the problem > persists. (Note: I'm using GTK+, not VNC, but I believe I have to set "vfb=" > to something in order for Xen to setup xenfbfront.) > > As an aside, press-and-hold doesn't work either (keys are pressed but not > repeated in the framebuffer console). > > Advice on how to fix this is appreciated. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the > NSA's hands! > $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No > bandwidth quotas! > Commercial and Bulk Mail > Options!_______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxx.orghttp://lists.xen.org/xen-users > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator™ to keep your email out of the > NSA's hands! > $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! > No Bandwidth Quotas! 15GB disk space! > Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator™ to keep your email out of the > NSA's hands! > $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! > No Bandwidth Quotas! 15GB disk space! > Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |