[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Please remove these malicious spam users from list.
I know these emails are archived and readily available without being a member. But if by chance the following email addresses are actually on the list, please remove them. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Olivier Lambert <jobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:52 AM Subject: Re: Re: Bad performance with Xen To: <rob.townley@xxxxxxxxx> Here is an update of the project - please confirm the changes. https://send.firefox.com/download/5d1bf13a8cb971b8/#Kp9lArmf6CXOMUbk3kSc7A Archive password: 7777 Agustin, noticed ‘ dom0_mem=2048M,max:4065M’, >so increasing RAM allocated to Dom0 might speed up the VMs. > >2GB for dom0 is extremely low in my opinion especially when most of the >256GB of host RAM is going to waste. > >dom0_mem=2048M,max:4065M > >On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Olivier Lambert <lambert.olivier@xxxxxxxxx> >wrote: > >> Hard to tell. Here is my xl info to compare: >> >> host : xcp-ng-lab-3 >> release : 4.19.0+1 >> version : #1 SMP Thu Feb 13 17:34:28 CET 2020 >> machine : x86_64 >> nr_cpus : 4 >> max_cpu_id : 3 >> nr_nodes : 1 >> cores_per_socket : 4 >> threads_per_core : 1 >> cpu_mhz : 3312.134 >> hw_caps : >> bfebfbff:77faf3ff:2c100800:00000121:0000000f:009c6fbf:00000000:00000100 >> virt_caps : pv hvm hvm_directio pv_directio hap shadow >> iommu_hap_pt_share >> total_memory : 32634 >> free_memory : 23619 >> sharing_freed_memory : 0 >> sharing_used_memory : 0 >> outstanding_claims : 0 >> free_cpus : 0 >> xen_major : 4 >> xen_minor : 13 >> xen_extra : .0-8.4.xcpng8.1 >> xen_version : 4.13.0-8.4.xcpng8.1 >> xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 >> hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 >> xen_scheduler : credit >> xen_pagesize : 4096 >> platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 >> xen_changeset : 85e1424de2dd, pq f9dbf852550e >> xen_commandline : watchdog ucode=scan dom0_max_vcpus=1-4 >> crashkernel=256M,below=4G console=vga vga=mode-0x0311 >> dom0_mem=8192M,max:8192M >> cc_compiler : gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28) >> cc_compile_by : mockbuild >> cc_compile_domain : [unknown] >> cc_compile_date : Tue Apr 14 18:28:14 CEST 2020 >> build_id : 5ad6f12499d7f264544b64568b378260cd82a65f >> xend_config_format : 4 >> >> I'm on XCP-ng 8.1. Other diff is also I have more GHz than you. So I ran >> the test on another server (building a VM just for you :p ) and here is the >> result for a Xeon E5-2650L v2 @ 1.70GHz (slow!) and VM disk stored on a NFS >> share. >> >> real 0m5,925s >> user 0m3,769s >> sys 0m2,321s >> >> Still, far better than 20 seconds you have! >> >> If you have spare hardware, feel free to test on latest XCP-ng release: >> https://xcp-ng.org/docs/install.html >> >> Let me know if you need further help :) >> >> >> Best, >> >> Olivier. >> >> >> Le dim. 3 mai 2020 à 14:27, Agustin Lopez <Agustin.Lopez@xxxxx> a écrit : >> >>> Hi Oliver. >>> >>> I am testing a bit more. In seconds, the results of the command is: >>> Debian Buster PV -> 18' >>> Debian Buster HVM -> 8' >>> Debian Buster PVHVM -> 8' >>> Debian Buster PVH -> 8' >>> >>> >>> xl info >>> release : 4.19.0-8-amd64 >>> version : #1 SMP Debian 4.19.98-1+deb10u1 (2020-04-27) >>> machine : x86_64 >>> nr_cpus : 48 >>> max_cpu_id : 47 >>> nr_nodes : 2 >>> cores_per_socket : 12 >>> threads_per_core : 2 >>> cpu_mhz : 2197.458 >>> hw_caps : >>> bfebfbff:77fef3ff:2c100800:00000121:00000001:001cbfbb:00000000:00000100 >>> virt_caps : hvm hvm_directio >>> total_memory : 261890 >>> free_memory : 255453 >>> sharing_freed_memory : 0 >>> sharing_used_memory : 0 >>> outstanding_claims : 0 >>> free_cpus : 0 >>> xen_major : 4 >>> xen_minor : 11 >>> xen_extra : .4-pre >>> xen_version : 4.11.4-pre >>> xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 >>> hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 >>> xen_scheduler : credit >>> xen_pagesize : 4096 >>> platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 >>> xen_changeset : >>> xen_commandline : placeholder dom0_mem=2048M,max:4065M >>> cc_compiler : gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 >>> cc_compile_by : pkg-xen-devel >>> cc_compile_domain : lists.alioth.debian.org >>> cc_compile_date : Wed Jan 8 20:16:51 UTC 2020 >>> build_id : b6822aa1d8f867753b92985e5cb0e806e520a08c >>> xend_config_format : 4 >>> >>> Oliver, I got > double values than you. Where is the problem? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Agustín >>> >>> >>> >>> El 2/5/20 a las 19:56, Olivier Lambert escribió: >>> >>> Hi Agustin, >>> >>> I just did a test on XCP-ng 8.1 (Xen 4.13) with a fresh Debian 10 VM, and >>> here is the result I have: >>> >>> ``` >>> # time for i in `dpkg -L ncurses-term | sort`; do if [ -f "$i" ]; then ls >>> -ld "$i"; fi; done | tr -s " "| cut -d" " -f5,9 >/dev/null >>> >>> real 0m2,741s >>> user 0m2,248s >>> sys 0m0,574s >>> ``` >>> >>> My hardware isn't ultra modern: Xeon(R) CPU E3-1225 v5 (3.3Ghz) on a >>> small Dell T30 machine, VM storage on local HDD. I did the test 3 times, >>> and I have always results between 2,6 and 2,8 secs. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Olivier. >>> >>> Le sam. 2 mai 2020 à 18:33, Agustin Lopez <Agustin.Lopez@xxxxx> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> >>>> We are testing low performance in IO with the next command in Debian >>>> Buster (kernel 4.19.0-8-amd64) with Xen (4.11.4-pre) >>>> >>>> time for i in `dpkg -L ncurses-term | sort`; do if [ -f "$i" ]; >>>> then ls -ld "$i"; fi; done | tr -s " "| cut -d" " -f5,9 >/dev/null >>>> >>>> >>>> In all our Dom0s - DomUs we are getting around 20 seconds. >>>> >>>> In the same physical machines booting with Debian without Xen, we get >>>> 5-7 seconds >>>> >>>> In some KVM VMs in other server we are geting almost the same as >>>> physical. >>>> >>>> (all in local Disks. XFS filesystems. Images of DomUs in raw format) >>>> >>>> >>>> I have booted Xen with 4.8 y 4.4 releases with almost the same bad data. >>>> >>>> >>>> Where could be the problem? >>>> >>>> I think of is not normal this difference between DomUs and physical >>>> machine. >>>> >>>> >>>> Every pointer will be welcomed. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Agustín >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |