[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 35/43] plat/common: Implement CPU suspend for arm64





On 18/07/18 14:28, Julien Grall wrote:


On 18/07/18 10:11, Wei Chen wrote:
Hi Julien,

Hi Wei,


-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
Sent: 2018年7月16日 21:48
To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>; minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
simon.kuenzer@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 35/43] plat/common: Implement
CPU suspend for arm64

Hi Wei,

On 06/07/18 10:03, Wei Chen wrote:
Using PSCI despatch function to call PSCI_CPU_SUSPEND
function to halt CPU.

Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>
---
   plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c        | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h |  2 ++
   2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c

diff --git a/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..07548bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause */
+/*
+ * Authors: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2018, Arm Ltd., All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
+ * are met:
+ *
+ * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+ *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+ * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright + *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the + *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
+ * 3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its
+ *    contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+ *    this software without specific prior written permission.
+ *
+ * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS
IS"
+ * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
THE
+ * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE
+ * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS
BE
+ * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
+ * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF
THE
+ * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+ *
+ * THIS HEADER MAY NOT BE EXTRACTED OR MODIFIED IN ANY WAY.
+ */
+
+#include <arm/cpu.h>
+#include <arm/cpu_defs.h>
+
+void halt(void)

Looking at the usage of halt, I think PSCI CPU suspend is too expensive
for brief idling.

I am not entirely sure of the semantic expected, but it looks like "wfi"
would be more suitable here.

Does timer interrupt can wake up wfi? If yes, I think I can't use wfi here.

Yes interrupt will wake-up the CPU. This is the same with PSCI suspend.

The main difference with the two is the latter will allow you to go in deeper state (depending on the arguments you passed).

I forgot to mention that PSCI CPU_SUSPEND will have some latency. Along with the states, this is usually encoded in the DT. So if you don't parse the DT and have some knowledge how long you will likely wait in suspend state, then calling CPU_SUSPEND will not be the best solutions.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Minios-devel mailing list
Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.