Re: generalising oxenstored for unix nodes too

[Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas.gazagnaire@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Ok, just going with making it Lwt+functor for now then, as is
> the quickest. I had a vague idea that we might be able to hang
> arbitrary continuations as the value for an entry, rather than just
> strings, so they could be woken up by the scheduler.
> However, thats step 2 :)  Just having it working in a stub domain
> for now would be most useful.

You don't need lwt to make it work as stub donain, as the scheduler is 
hand-made and do not use threads. But indeed, that would be a nice improvement 
(but do you really need that?)


--
Thomas