Re: ocaml-dns- quick ocaml question

[Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18 Jun 2012, at 19:43, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:

> So cstruct shouldnt be a constraint; it's trivial to retarget to polymorphic 
> variants. There is a very slight performance hit, but I don't think that 
> matters.

i'll go with non-polymorphic variants for now - it's only search+replace - and 
a closed type is "better", right? 

(i may well have moulinexed and/or invented terms there :)

-- 
Cheers,

R.




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy 
or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  
Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily 
reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.