[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Manager.connect possible implementation

To: 'Anil Madhavapeddy' <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>, Haris Rotsos <cr409@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:40:12 +0100
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Balraj Singh <balrajsingh@xxxxxxxx>, "cl-mirage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mailing List" <cl-mirage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-id: MirageOS development <cl-mirage.lists.cam.ac.uk>
Thread-index: Ac1dp8LevlvbQUQwSh6AmTY8YuvaTQADtQMg
Thread-topic: Manager.connect possible implementation

Hi,

...
> I was thinking that an Interface module (to match the ifconfig-style
> configuration on UNIX) would provide an easy mapping to/from UNIX.
> 
> Dave: is there anything useful we can grab from XCP to act as the UNIX
> version of this library? Networkd?  The Mirage version will be the
> current
> code that launches all the relevant protocol threads.

The networkd might be useful -- it is able to configure bridges, openvswitch 
instances, IP addresses etc. It might be worth ripping out (err sharing) some 
of the internals if we refactored them into a library.

Cheers,
Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Manager.connect possible implementation
  - From: 'Anil Madhavapeddy'

References:
- Re: Manager.connect possible implementation
  - From: Anil Madhavapeddy

Prev by Date: Re: Manager.connect possible implementation
Next by Date: RE: 64-bit bootloaders
Previous by thread: Re: Manager.connect possible implementation
Next by thread: Re: Manager.connect possible implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.