Re: data structure lockin

[Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3 Jan 2013, at 16:37, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:

> This is primarily because polymorphic hashtables are quick and
> easy, but luckily refactoring them is also quite easy. 

fwiw came across the following post describing such refactoring (for unit 
testing, but hey):

http://mcclurmc.wordpress.com/2012/12/18/ocaml-pattern-easy-functor/

thought it might be of interest to others...


-- 
Cheers,

R.




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may 
contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, 
please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy 
or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  
Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily 
reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.