|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Fixed Mirage
On 12/07/2013 01:05, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 12 Jul 2013, at 00:56, "Vincent B."<vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:>On 11/07/2013 23:48, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:>>Hm, this is still pretty broken and crashes immediately on boot with >>master/: >> >>https://github.com/mirage/mirage-platform/commit/ab88ef636fe3ff06c8638d5ea765ad25bf9610e2> >Whas crashes exactly ? the basic example with DHCP was working well for >me when I commited those changes…Are you sure you tested with the changes you committed or with a slightly earlier version? Yeah, almost certain. >>Why did you remove the zeroing of the Io_pages? That breaks >>everything and the domain crashes as so> on as any shared rings are >>used, since there is garbage on the ring at start. I added a >>memset(block, 0, len) into alloc_pages, and the domain now boots ok, >>but I still see a lot of packet loss. Investigating...> >But I added the zeroing in the first place!!! Previously there was no zeroing at all, I then added it but removed it after I observed that the pages returned by memalign were actually always zeroed.The bug is in a changeset marked "cosmetics" :-) https://github.com/mirage/mirage-platform/commit/41f26e337beeb6799f9e04c304480ecca98f0fef You removed this hunk from allocate_ring: - for i = 0 to Cstruct.len x - 1 do - Cstruct.set_uint8 x i 0 - done; which zeros the ring, and Io_pages are also no longer zeroed since you reverted that earlier. One or the other is needed. I'd prefer that pages not be zeroed by default, since only the rings really need it.>I had the impression that Xen would always zero the pages in order for domains not to be able to see other domains memory… Oh I see. I again I did not see that clearly. Yeah, I should definitely not have removed this hunk… Vincent
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |