Re: [MirageOS-devel] Update on entropy

[Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> And the question I am raising is: Are there objections to this? Did
> anyone want to code something that requires direct access to entropy
> sources (i.e. another RNG)? Did anyone want to make a separate entropy
> provider?

I think that's a good idea. We should still keep the modular approach of 
MirageOS (ie. having separate librarie(s) to deal with entropy) but I'm fine to 
remove the ENTROPY signature for V1 and V1_LWT as it doesn't bring much (apart 
from confusion it appears).

Thomas


_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel