[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Update on entropy


> And the question I am raising is: Are there objections to this? Did
> anyone want to code something that requires direct access to entropy
> sources (i.e. another RNG)? Did anyone want to make a separate entropy
> provider?

I think that's a good idea. We should still keep the modular approach of 
MirageOS (ie. having separate librarie(s) to deal with entropy) but I'm fine to 
remove the ENTROPY signature for V1 and V1_LWT as it doesn't bring much (apart 
from confusion it appears).


MirageOS-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.