Re: [MirageOS-devel] Thoughts on logging

[Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm in favour of using Logs as soon as possible instead of adding more stuff to 
mirage-types. The only blocker for now is that's Logs is not released :-) 

Would it be possible to release a 0.1 of logs Daniel so we can switch using 
quickly?

Thanks,
Thomas

> On 3 Dec 2015, at 11:28, Daniel BÃnzli <daniel.buenzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Le jeudi, 3 dÃcembre 2015 Ã 11:18, Thomas Leonard a Ãcrit :
>> Yes, it would be good to clarify this. My view is that mirage-types
>> should be for "module types that have been specified/standardised by
>> the Mirage project". i.e. projects that use these types are more
>> likely to work together. So mirage-types is the Mirage equivalent of
>> POSIX.
> 
> I think that if mirage aims at being a truly composable and versatile system 
> it should avoid having a notion of POSIX, except as I said for interacting 
> with the hardware.
> 
> Best,  
> 
> Daniel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MirageOS-devel mailing list
> MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel


_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel