Xen project Mailing List

Re: [MirageOS-devel] going ocaml 4.02-only

To: Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:18:11 +0000

Cc: Jeremie Dimino <jdimino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mirageos-devel <mirageos-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:18:24 +0000

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=recoil.org; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=xaQrugNYY4YBpGLMHHqNMtruTTa9ulfXcJhVSzGzocnD+P9zemF ZPjIXecMdUzTXi7oBP1BTg3lW5EP1OEY/MNpaj4BQAP8e+0pPharQLJ0AqgV1VTr W24sQE1KJXaqo7gWAKmOnh4cQnnaUcDvAxk4Fv9scwoFgLagrTRvKncg=

List-id: Developer list for MirageOS <mirageos-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 22 Feb 2016, at 12:10, Thomas Gazagnaire <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Any strong objections to dropping 4.01 support in Mirage libraries to allow >> us to take advantage of PPX and drop camlp4? > > With 4.03 almost out-of-the-door it makes sense to start dropping 4.01. It's important that if we do drop 4.01, we do it as a concerted effort to shift to 4.02, or else there'll be all sorts of constraints hell. In particular, we don't want to have a split in the package universe around sexplib and camlp4 (with half depending on the old version of Core and the newer ones on the latest one). So for base packages like cstruct, I've been keeping an eye on that, but please do so for yours as well. -Anil _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.