Xen project Mailing List

Re: [MirageOS-devel] deprecating 4.02?

From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:18:07 +0100

Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 10:18:19 +0000

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=recoil.org; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= selector1; b=XUfspjC7WP4Jy8IQ02f6ezW6J9W+eyckJ9P4ykuu1XSzTgnO8g1 ydybvLTFSScbqCCFrigg3wZdzL4Fj2rdeHjrvv2P//zZR3JMJAlYeIyL3p4aJtiu J3fKXpEQrGrAw6l7n2JT1ydt8HCAVFdGguwVW17xewXEG9/rRni5IWgA=

List-id: Developer list for MirageOS <mirageos-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 1 Sep 2016, at 10:58, Martin Lucina <martin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday, 01.09.2016 at 10:05, Hannes Mehnert wrote: >> On 31/08/2016 17:31, Mindy wrote: >>> Having just tripped over something available in 4.03 but not 4.02 >> >> is this significant enough to drop 4.02 support (or is it only the >> Hashtbl.filter_map_inplace)? >> >> Since most MirageOS applications deployed in the wild still use 4.02, >> I'd appreciate keeping it (until e.g. 4.04 is released, and >> ocaml-freestanding & mirage-xen-ocaml support 4.04). > > Which OPAM switch should I use for developing 4.04 support in > ocaml-freestanding? 4.04.0+beta1? 4.04.0+trunk would be better, as it'll just grab the latest snap of the branch (which should be fairly stable now, but has had significant revisions since beta1). Anil _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.