[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [MirageOS-devel] network performance question
From my first mail: ubuntu VM: iperf -c 192.168.122.20 -t10 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.122.20, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 192.168.122.1 port 52674 connected with 192.168.122.20 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 52.9 GBytes 45.4 Gbits/sec top: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4401 qemu 20 0 6038648 2.309g 22968 S 100.0 7.4 43:24.27 qemu-system-x86 4422 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 83.2 0.0 0:22.90 vhost-4401 24759 justin_+ 20 0 165812 1892 1728 S 51.5 0.0 0:03.91 iperf I left the -P (number of parallel client threads to run) at default value - which is 1. KVM VM used 100% (1 whole cpu core), and the corresponding vhost process used 80% of CPU core. So I did run test in single-thread mode for both Linux VM and MirageOS. On XEN, xentop also showed 100% cpu usage for the MirageOS VM. Thank you for answering Justin On 10/24/2017 02:30 PM, Takayuki Imada wrote: Hi, This is similar to what I observed previously, not so surprising.But, I want you to check how many CPU cores are totally utilized on both the Linux VM and MirageOS configurations. I guess only 1 CPU core are utilized on the MirageOS configuration whereas multiple CPU cores are utilized on the Linux configuration.Kind regards, _______________________________________________ MirageOS-devel mailing list MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |