Re: [Publicity] Xen Project Hypervisor 4.5 blog

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Should we more clearly identify it as an experimental feature? 
I am adding the "status" such as experimental into 
http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Release_Features
We don't have to do this in the blog

Regards
Lars

On 8 Jan 2015, at 15:48, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 15:47 -0600, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> Hi Dario,
>> 
> Hi,
> 
>>      * Updates for automotive and embedded systems: Improved
>>        multi-core, real-time scheduling support in Xen Project
>>        Hypervisor allows users to predict timing and performance of
>>        VM, laying the groundwork for Xen in embedded and automotive
>>        software stacks.
>> 
> Seems fine.
> 
>> Should we more clearly identify it as an experimental feature? 
>> 
> I am not sure. Most of the people outside of the  embedded/automotive
> community would not care much about it for a while, and hence, no big
> deal.
> 
> However, the risk of laying down false expectations is high, so I would
> clarify it a bit. Perhaps:
> 
> "Improved multi-core real-time scheduling support in Xen Project
> Hypervisor allows"  --> "A new, though still experimental, multi-core
> enabled real-time scheduler was included in Xen Project Hypervisor,
> allowing"
> 
> Regards,
> Dario
> 
> -- 
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Publicity mailing list
> Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity


_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity