Re: [Publicity] rump kernel and Rumprun unikernel proposed post

[Antti Kantee <pooka@xxxxxx>]

Ok, I finished editing.  Hopefully I addressed everyone's comments, plus 
some minor wording fixes all around.  Thanks for the comments everyone, 
I think the post is much better now!
        https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=10870&preview=true

Seeing that others edit the post directly, I assume I will be included 
in the set of people who review and approve the final.  I'm not agreeing 
to someone else publishing an edited version in my name.
On 03/08/15 18:33, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> Only if it makes sense within the post!  Not sure it does, as there's quite a lot in 
> there already.  Perhaps the best thing to do is to wait for Martin to write up his, and 
> then retrospectively edit in a link to it as "further reading" in this one.  We 
> do that fairly often in the MirageOS blog so that posts remain easy to follow after later 
> ones have been published.
I really don't want to retroactively change the post, because it gives 
the false impression that the post is maintained also for whatever else 
might have happened since publishing.  I _tried_ to selectively write 
about technical things so that they wouldn't go out-of-date, but who 
knows.  I do hope that the "future work" bits will go out-of-date ...
I did add a link to the page where we amass various rump kernel 
publications and talks, so folks can check a single location for any new 
posts at any later date.  I think that serves the purpose without me 
having to sign up for maintenance.  (using architecture to avoid 
maintenance is one of the high themes of rump kernels ;)
  - antti

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity