Re: Varargs in AdapterVifCallbacks.

["Durrant, Paul" <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/05/2022 15:25, Martin Harvey wrote:
> Some of the callback functions specified in the XENVIF_VIF interface 
> rely on varargs callbacks. A little experimentation with the 
> aforementioned makes me believe that varargs is not as wonderful as it 
> should be in a kernel context. Additionally, it’s not used in windows 
> kernel API’s anywhere else, presumably for a reason.
Not necessarily. Can you elaborate on "not as wonderful as it should be"?

> Any complaints if I remove varargs from upcoming v9  of XENVIF_VIF 
> interface? Speak now or forever …
I could be persuaded that an argument struct is a suitable replacement 
but I'd like to understand what the exact nature of the problem is.
  Paul