[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnttab: Don't free resources through an ASSERT

To: win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Tu Dinh <ngoc-tu.dinh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 14:34:28 +0200
Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=vates.tech header.i="@vates.tech" header.h="From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID"
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:34:32 +0000
Feedback-id: default:8631fc262581453bbf619ec5b2062170:Sweego
List-id: Developer list for the Windows PV Drivers subproject <win-pv-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13/10/2026 14:32, Tu Dinh wrote:
> ASSERT macros skip evaluating their contents, so calling e.g.
> RevokeForeignAccess inside an ASSERT will end up causing the call to be
> skipped in release builds.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tu Dinh <ngoc-tu.dinh@xxxxxxxxxx>

These 4 patches are meant to be applied on top of David's 10-patch 
series and tested in that context.


--
Ngoc Tu Dinh | Vates XCP-ng Developer

XCP-ng & Xen Orchestra - Vates solutions

web: https://vates.tech

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnttab: Don't free resources through an ASSERT
  - From: Owen Smith

References:
- [PATCH 1/4] gnttab: Don't free resources through an ASSERT
  - From: Tu Dinh

Prev by Date: [PATCH 4/4] Define a common GNTTAB_MAX_PAGES
Next by Date: Re: [XENBUS PATCH] gnttab: Use for loop in GnttabRevokeForeignAccess
Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/4] Define a common GNTTAB_MAX_PAGES
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnttab: Don't free resources through an ASSERT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.