[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-bugs] [Bug 1612] x86-64 : Can't start VM when vif set
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1612 ------- Comment #7 from joseph.deming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2010-05-21 11:18 ------- yes, i do get that error. here's a bit more from my end: [ 0.026832] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 0.026884] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 0.026938] Performance Events: AMD PMU driver. [ 0.027023] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.027085] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-12-amd64-tnQeYz/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_amd64_xen/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:721 ini t_hw_perf_events+0x32d/0x3cd() [ 0.027189] Hardware name: PowerEdge R805 [ 0.027241] Modules linked in: [ 0.027325] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 [ 0.027382] Call Trace: [ 0.027436] [<ffffffff81500a0f>] ? init_hw_perf_events+0x32d/0x3cd [ 0.027494] [<ffffffff81500a0f>] ? init_hw_perf_events+0x32d/0x3cd [ 0.027554] [<ffffffff8104fc68>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa3 [ 0.027612] [<ffffffff81500a0f>] ? init_hw_perf_events+0x32d/0x3cd [ 0.027673] [<ffffffff812fd38f>] ? identify_cpu+0x2ff/0x308 [ 0.027732] [<ffffffff8100eb4f>] ? xen_restore_fl_direct_end+0x0/0x1 [ 0.027792] [<ffffffff810e85f5>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x8c/0xf0 [ 0.027850] [<ffffffff81500636>] ? identify_boot_cpu+0x15/0x3e [ 0.027907] [<ffffffff815006bd>] ? check_bugs+0x9/0x2e [ 0.027974] [<ffffffff814f9cc2>] ? start_kernel+0x3cd/0x3e8 [ 0.028001] [<ffffffff814fbad7>] ? xen_start_kernel+0x649/0x64f [ 0.028001] ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]--- [ 0.028001] ... version: 0 [ 0.028001] ... bit width: 48 [ 0.028001] ... generic registers: 4 [ 0.028001] ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff [ 0.028001] ... max period: 00007fffffffffff [ 0.028001] ... fixed-purpose events: 0 [ 0.028001] ... event mask: 000000000000000f [ 155.228843] Event-channel device installed. [ 155.658856] alloc irq_desc for 3238 on node 0 [ 155.658860] alloc kstat_irqs on node 0 [ 155.658927] alloc irq_desc for 3237 on node 0 [ 155.658930] alloc kstat_irqs on node 0 [ 155.659332] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.659456] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.659624] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.659778] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.659922] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.660857] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661027] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661183] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661340] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661606] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661757] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 155.661906] XENBUS: Unable to read cpu state [ 157.156279] Bridge firewalling registered May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: device 0x17303e0 has devpath '/devices/virtual/misc/evtchn' May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: LINK 'char/10:57' /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:2 May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: NAME 'xen/evtchn' /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:48 May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: LINK 'xen/evtchn' /lib/udev/rules.d/xen-backend.rules:8 May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: kernel-provided name 'evtchn' and NAME= 'xen/evtchn' disagree, please use SYMLINK+= or change the kernel to provid e the proper name May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: created db link (xen/evtchn char/10:57 xen/evtchn) May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: creating device node '/dev/xen/evtchn', devnum=10:57, mode=0660, uid=0, gid=0 May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: mknod(/dev/xen/evtchn, 020660, (10,57)) May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: set permissions /dev/xen/evtchn, 020660, uid=0, gid=0 May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: creating symlink '/dev/char/10:57' to '../xen/evtchn' May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: creating link '/dev/xen/evtchn' to '/dev/xen/evtchn' May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: found existing node instead of symlink '/dev/xen/evtchn' May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: device node '/dev/xen/evtchn' already exists, link to '/dev/xen/evtchn' will not overwrite it May 21 13:31:16 kraid udevd-work[522]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x173cb20 - one line like you mentioned for each of core in my machine (2x6-core amd) - the first 'crash' appears immediately after boot, don't have reason to suspect it's related to this issue directly - and, i included the NAME vs. SYMLINK msg that keeps coming out for the xen/evtchn driver, i also don't have reason to suspect it's related, but i was looking into udev issues for a bit - there's also some apparently outdated code that triggers the 'physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore' warnings almost postively from the file /etc/xen/scripts/vif-common.sh:76-78 but i feel most of this is superfluous. i noticed i can trigger the crash explicitly by calling 'xm network-attach wario vifname=vif1.99' where wario is a currently running vm that has been created and already caused the crash during creation for it's existing interfaces, and vif1.99 is a made up name that is not defined elsewhere in my configs. i suspect you could create it more cleanly by bringing up a domain with no vif's in the config file, then calling 'xm network-attach <domain_name> <vifname=XXX> etc' -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. _______________________________________________ Xen-bugs mailing list Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |