Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?

[Chris Mason <mason@xxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 13:39, Gregory Newby wrote:
> Two quickies for the Xen developers:
> 
> 1. Are you putting code changes into both the 1.1rc and
> -unstable code base?  If not, which one is getting all
> the patches that Bin and others have been applying?
> 
> 2. Awhile ago, I thought that Kurt added ReiserFS support
> by default to the Xen kernel (2.4.22 tree's .config).  This
> doesn't seem to be there now, but I'd like to urge you to consider
> adding it by default.  It doesn't add much size to the kernel
> image, and seems like a no-brainer to enable.
> 
> I want to go and hit someone at RedHat over the head with
> a cluebat for not enabling ReiserFS, and take the 
> same cluebat to someone at SuSE for not enabling ext3.

Haven't tried the RH kernel for reiserfs, but SUSE definitely supports
ext3.

-chris




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel