[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] fooey. no interrupts.
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Keir Fraser wrote: > Unmasking evtchn_upcall_mask and evtchn_mask[] need special attention > because a pending interrupt will not automatically get raised as it > would on real hardware ---- think of it like an edge-triggered > interrupt where you lost the edge because the line was masked. So what > we do in Linux is: in any event, if clock interrupts are enabled, shouldn't I get an interrupt 500 ms later? Or am I misreading the code. ron -- LANL CCS-1 email flavor: ***** Correspondence [X] ***** DUSA LACSI-HW [ ] ***** DUSA LACSI-OS [ ] ***** DUSA LACSI-CS [ ] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |