[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: debian
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 14:10 +0200, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > James Harper wrote: > > I just tried building a debian xen0 kernel with the standard make-kpkg > > tools and the packages from www.terrabox.com, and while it gave me a > > resulting package, I noted the following: > > > . resulting package name is kernel-xen0-2.6.9_1_i386.deb where I would > > have expected kernel-image-2.6.9... > > This is intentional, I believe, but I'm not sure if it is > correct. Obviously kernel-image-2.6.9 is different from > kernel-xen0-2.6.9 and needs to contain different scripts and be > handled differently. But, since the kernel version is still the > determining factor in many paths (like /lib/modules/2.6.9), the > package would need to conflict with every other kernel by the same > version. So, I'm really not sure what would be the best approach here. This is why I use kver-extraver-privmode as the uname -r in xenlinuxbuilder. You can specify extraversion in make-kpkg and avoid this kind of conflict in most things. > > > . no initrd generated on install even though I requested one on the > > make-kpkg commandline > > I would say this is a bug - the Xen postinst scripts are not those of > normal i386 kernels I believe, so they need fixing. I have never tried > initrd kernels with Xen. Probably because the initrd creation scripts for i386-xen don't exist yet. Probably just a symlink to the normal i386 in debian would do the trick. :) > > > . enabling pnp bios support caused a failed compile. Probably don't want > > this anyway though as I understand there is no way to access pnp bios > > info from xen. > > There are things in the kernel config, which if enabled, cause the > compilation to fail. The Xen guys probably will be fixing these as > they crop up. I'm hitting a few myself at compile time as I refine a +kitchen-sink config for the debianized kernels that I haven't released yet. I'll release info when I get back to tweaking the sets. > > And I would *guess* that with Xen 2.1, accessing the PnP bios info > from Xen should work as with a normal machine. > > > Is this normal? > > Well, normal - I guess. > > -- Naked > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel -- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |