Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.6.10, reiser4, kernel 2.4.27 cpu load, and mailing list reply-to

[Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:06:39PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> 1.   Is there a way to compile kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.9-mm1 with xen 2.0?
> I tried both (with mkbuildtree from linux-2.6.9-xen-sparse), and both 
> failed (on different places).
> My primary goal is to use reiser4 on both xen-0 and xen-U kernel, so I'm 
> more
> interested in -mm kernel.

The Linux sparse tree in xen-2.0-testing.bk and xen-unstable.bk has
been updated to 2.6.10.  The -mm tree should include support for arch/xen,
and should work on xen-2.0 and xen-2.0-testing.

> 2.  If I use kernel 2.4.27 (xen-U), top doesn't show correct cpu usage 
> percentage (idle %, nice %, and so on).
> It shows either 0% usage on all, or 33% usage each for irq,  softirq, 
> and iowait.
> Is there a way to fix this? Kernel 2.6.9 shows correct cpu usage.

I tried this (top in Linux 2.4.28) just now and top works except that
nothing ever is accounted as system time, this needs to be fixed.  But
I definitely don't see the only-0%/33% usages like you're reporting.

> 3.   Can someone please set "reply-to" address of this list to the list 
> address?
> Otherwise, some people might miss answer to some questions (since reply 
> is only to the sender)
> or the sender gets duplicate mail (from Reply-All).

I personally think the current setup is fine.

    christian



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel