[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xen and virtual iron
Sean Harper wrote: Hmm, sounds like a NUMA system, with a relatively low throughput and high latency interconnect. Not sure if anyone would want to do this on a workload where performance matters.At Linuxworld a company called Virtual Iron is demoing a product that, like Xen or VMWare, can break physical machines into virtual machines. However, unlike Xen or VMWare, this product can also aggregate physical machines into virtual machines. In other words, it is possible for the user to specify that 3.5 cpus from 2 machines (2 from 1 and 1.5 from another) be assigned to a virtual machine. When linux boots on that virtual machine it simply looks like a 4 cpu machine (but 1 of the cpus is slower). Presumably there is a pretty big performance penalty for sharing across machines, which they mitigate to some extent by requiring Infiniband. It seems like most of the tricky work is around caching to optimize the performance across the slower communication bus (when sharing between machines). I suppose with a layer of abstraction like Xen, doing something like this is feasible. You could leverage the NUMA code in the linux kernel, but I would think you would need a very highly parallel workload to make this effective, and if you have that, a cluster setup would probably work just as well anyway. -Andrew Theurer ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |