[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] 2.4.29-xenU VBD performance (problem)
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 11:14:50PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote: > > > Both the dom0 and domU were using 128 MB of RAM. I tested with: > > "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/foo bs=1024k count=2048". That makes > > 2 GB of data to > > write, so that will definitely not fit in the RAM / buffers. I ran the > > "test" three times on each kernel to be sure about the result. > > The CPU in the test-box was 3 GHz P4 with 1 MB of l2-cache. > > The box (both > > the dom0 and domU) were idle besides running the test. > > Have you tried enabling hyperthreading and running the dom0 and domU's on > different threads? > I enabled hyperthreading and ran dom0 with cpu0 and domU with cpu1. dom0 performance remained the same as previously (93 MB/sec). 2.6.10-xenU performance increased from 58 MB/sec -> 69 MB/sec. 2.4.29-xenU performance remained the same at 23 MB/sec. It seems that enabling hyperthreading and running domains with different (virtual) cpu:s increase performance. Hyperthreading enabled, but running domU with same (virtual) cpu as dom0 caused the performance to be the same as with hyperthreading disabled. > We haven't done any testing with software raid 5 systems. It's possible the > extra CPU burnt by dom0 is causing bad scheduling interactions. > It might be.. anyway, 2.4-domU performance is really bad.. -- Pasi Kärkkäinen ^ . . Linux / - \ Choice.of.the .Next.Generation. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |